Fellow
Shortrunners,
The economy is sending mixed signals as to which path it intends to take. For the most part, economists don't seem to have much to agree on except that the recovery certainly isn't happening right now. In fact, some economists have even begun to question the eleven interest rate cuts of 2001. Interest rates in the United States are at 40 year lows and the cuts are taking place in an economy that is known for its exuberance and one which is already receiving fiscal stimuli. Indeed rising joblessness and falling demand merit action, but some skeptics argue that taking interest rates too low could be damaging as well. The Fed under Alan Greenspan has been well respected for several reasons, and its control over inflation and its gradual (non-shocking) moves are not the least of these. If interests rates sink too far, excess liquidity in the system could easily lead to inflated stock prices, excessive demand, and in short time, inflation. Supporters of the Fed might argue that while this may occur, the Fed could and would act to prevent perceived inflation by reigning in interest rates. Indeed this is how the term counter-cyclical came to be applied to monetary policy because it would act against the economic cycle, to temper growth and shorten slowdowns. I would argue in support of the Fed as well, but there are still other obstacles. If interest rates are indeed too low (they've fallen much lower than say those of the ECB, which are typically more responsive to our actions), then two immediate worries come to mind. The first is the Keynesian idea of a liquidity trap, which has been generally ruled out as a possibility for the US economy. The second danger would surface if the Fed needed to raise rates rapidly to restrain inflation. In this case, the markets, which have become accustomed to lower interest rates of late, (and likely take a large chunk of their current valuations from the low interest rate climate) might be overly susceptible to rate hikes. This would be especially true if stocks are indeed overvalued at current levels as many doomsday analysts like to continue chiming. Again here though, its hard to say that the Fed is not making the right decisions given its current situation. If indeed it needed to raise interest rates to curtail inflation, it would do so and probably continue to state that it does not not make policy based on the stock market. While the influence of the stock market on the "real economy" does appear to growing, I think the fall in asset values in 2001 was a humbling experience for the markets and is likely to help curtail volatility and its impact on the economy. Indeed a weaker stock market may just have given the Fed enough room to make its rate cuts, which combined with the tax cut and September 11th relief efforts are providing a massive stimulus to the economy, without the worry of excessive inflation. Sincerely, Daniel Hicks
NAPM (ISM) Index: 48.2
Construction Spending: 0.8%
Jobless Claims: 447,000
Unemployment: 5.8%
Check out the new classroom section and watch for it to grow and change in the coming weeks as we implement drastic reconstruction to the section. Comment and suggestions as to the best method for this kind of a section would be extremely helpful.
Newest Articles: Balance
East and West Bush's
Tax Plan Just Doesn't Cut It
Money
and Power by Howard Means
Check out the new additions to the book reviews section. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
There are currently 596 subscribers to the short run weekly SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com