Fellow
Shortrunners,
Several significant economic developments occurred this week. First, we've been watching oil prices recently, as OPEC has flirted with the possibility of cutting production. Fortunately for consumers, Russia (a non-OPEC nation) has refused to match what OPEC would like to see in production cuts. On Wednesday, in an apparent 180, Russia agreed to slash its production by 150,000 barrels per day. Unfortunately for OPEC however, oil prices are unlikely to react significantly. One of the most heavily populated portions of the world's largest energy consuming nations, the east coast, has been experiencing an unusually warm winter. The warmth has quelled demand for oil to power things such as home heating, and combined with shrinking output, the slackened demand is preventing upward movement in oil prices. Furthermore, many traders are skeptical about the effects of Russia's promise to cut oil production. Historically, the extreme cold of the Russian winter forces the country to cut back on its oil production by nearly as many barrels. Other economists argue that Russia's oil industry is already largely privatized. If so, its government will have a hard time constraining its industry's output. The "cheating" problem is further aggravated by an already established regime of corruption and poor statistical accounting. Another of my favorite topics made the news again this week. The Argentine government, in an effort to prevent default on its $135 billion debt, passed currency controls. The controls essentially amount to a decree that Argentines cannot remove more than $1000 per month from their bank accounts. The move was made in response to a large outflow of currency. The government would have had to cover further currency flights to preserve its currency peg and its central bank's reserves were falling. At present, there doesn't appear to be a lot of promising things that Argentina can do. First, some argue that Argentina could completely dollarize, this movement would end currency speculation on its banks ability to produce pesos but it would represent a total loss of monetary autonomy. Second, it could look to restructure its debt, but this has been done time and time again and would amount to nothing more than delaying a default. Finally, Argentina's economy has begun to seriously contract and its ability to export to meet its debt payments is unlikely given the current global slowdown. Help could come from the IMF, but as is typical such help would come with stipulations. Most likely, the IMF would push Argentina to devalue the peso relative to the dollar (i.e. to shift its pegging away from one peso to one dollar). Such a move is dangerous for the nation however because if citizens fear devaluations, they will attempt to move all their currency into dollars. Another possible IMF demand could be for complete dollarization, as I described earlier. Economists are divided on what is best for the nation, with some advocating dollarization and others advocating floating the currency. Whatever happens, Argentina's economy is likely to be thrown further in turmoil. Sincerely, Daniel Hicks
Construction Spending: 1.9%
Personal Income: 0.0%
NAPM Manufacturing: 45.5%
NAPM Non-Manufacturing: 51.3%
Productivity: 1.5%
Check out the new classroom section and watch for it to grow and change in the coming weeks as we implement drastic reconstruction to the section. Comment and suggestions as to the best method for this kind of a section would be extremely helpful.
Newest Articles: Balance
East and West Bush's
Tax Plan Just Doesn't Cut It
Money
and Power by Howard Means
Check out the new additions to the book reviews section. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
SCREEN SAVER
Issue #80 There are currently 562 subscribers to the short run weekly
|
theshortrun.com