Fellow
Shortrunners,
As I am writing this, the United States and England, with backing from a range of other nations, have begun bombing campaigns in Afghanistan. I'm not sure anyone at the moment really knows how successful they are, how successful we will be, or even if there will be any further terrorist actions provoked by our retaliation. It is difficult to see what the long-run implications of all of this will be. These and other questions have put the nation in a state of uncertainty. Among economists, a lot of emphasis has been placed on the massive fiscal stimulus that all this government activity will provide. Economists are social scientists too, however. They study people, and psychologically, there are a range of economic consequences that will likely occur from the attacks and from today's actions. Economic uncertainty clouds the decision making process. Uncertainty as a general economic rule is a bad thing. Economists like to draw up models of the economy and of different situations, all of which are grounded in a set of assumptions. Recently, economists have come under fire for these often heroic assumptions, which include such as ideas as people make rational decisions and more relevant to our current situation, that there is good information/transaction clarity (lack of uncertainty). I'd like to briefly focus on some of the effects of uncertainty this week by looking at how it affects consumers, businesses, and finally, what it means for the government's role in the economy. I'm sure there is a slew of political news to be keeping up with so I'll be brief. For individuals and families this means that they will likely slow down and become more cautious. For example a consumer might change his current travel plans. Anything that makes someone worry about the future might induce them to put aside a larger portion of their income as savings. Other individuals may take a second look at what careers they choose. For many Americans, dismal economic prospects and the threat of conflict in far away places tends to increase their incentive to remain in school (which represents a short-run drag on output and a longer-run benefit). For businesses, longer-term planning decisions are disrupted, slowing the economy and hampering investment decisions and productivity growth. For example, when every American begins to ask questions about their future, these thoughts factor into their conceptions of what is best for a business. If executives perceive higher risks, they may shirk from the undertaking of new investment activities, choosing instead to remain cautious. When there is a movement from riskier investment prospects, we tend to see decreases in productivity growth as new, possibly successful, ventures are shelved for a later date. For government, it means a larger role. This in turn implies a shift in society's resources, such that larger portions of its workers and capital are employed by the government. Most governmental activities don't produce some sort of tangible economic output. Safety procedures or successful reconnaissance missions, although extremely important, are not as easily quantified when it comes down to calculating some sort of measure of economic well being. That said, it is likely that a shift of more of the economy into government will slow the measured rate of "economic growth," at least in the short run.
God Bless America,
Daniel Hicks
Personal Income: 0.2%
Construction Spending: -1.1%
NAPM Index: 47
NAPM (Non-Mfg) Index: 50.2
Jobless Claims : 528,000
Unemployment:
4.9%
Consumer
Credit: 1.7%
ECRI
Future Inflation Gauge: 99.4
Check out the new classroom section and watch for it to grow and change in the coming weeks as we implement drastic reconstruction to the section. Comment and suggestions as to the best method for this kind of a section would be extremely helpful.
Newest Articles: Balance
East and West Bush's
Tax Plan Just Doesn't Cut It
Money
and Power by Howard Means
Check out the new additions to the book reviews section. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
SCREEN SAVER
Issue #71 There are currently 510 subscribers to the short run weekly
|
theshortrun.com