Fellow
Shortrunners,
On Tuesday, the FOMC decided to cut interest rates yet another quarter point. The move represents the 7th cut this year, and brings the cumulative fall in rates to 3%. The surprising lack of economic rejuvenation sparked by these movements has had far reaching consequences both inside and outside the field of economics and has instigated a great deal of discussion on the issue. For starters, monetary policy, some suggest, is becoming demystified. It appears that each additional move is more strongly anticipated and thus receives much less of a visible immediate economic impact than it has done over the past few years. Some analysts anticipate that the revision to last quarter's GDP growth, in light of new evidence, will show signs of economic contraction. The market for Fed Funds Futures had factored in a 100% chance of a 25 basis point cut. This means that those trading the futures fully anticipated Tuesday's cut. The only thing that they were unsure of was the slight possibility of a larger cut. Indeed, contracting GDP will lead to further pressure for future rate cuts. Among economists, the rate cuts have brought renewed interest in the study of monetary policy and its lags. The most recent publication of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis featured work on this subject by several economists including Lawrence Meyer. In spite of the talks about lags and monetary policy effectiveness, I think the focus should really be not on when will the economy rebound, but on why it is slowing in the first place. Greenspan's control and the actions of the Fed have a strong impact on credit and on economic activity in the US. They cannot, however, rectify global economic downturn. The implications of a global slowdown extend beyond declining exports and fluctuating foreign investment in the US. Often times when watching one individual economic indicator go through periods of rapid growth, we see a correction, and it's possible that slow economic growth may be nothing more than a correction from the rapid growth of the 1990's to a more sustainable rate. Indeed, a renaissance of the work of early economists from the National Bureau of Economic Research is taking place. They were pioneers in the study of events such as this, and if many are still around today, they might smile to know that indeed the Business Cycle lives on.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks Economic Releases The data section provides charts and data for the most important economic indicators. Treasury Budget: $2.5 Billion
Index of Leading Indicators:0.3%
Jobless Claims: 393,000
Advance Durable Goods Orders: -0.6%
New
Home Sales: 950,000
ECRI Weekly Leading Index:
119.4
Check out the new classroom section and watch for it to grow and change in the coming weeks as we implement drastic reconstruction to the section. Comment and suggestions as to the best method for this kind of a section would be extremely helpful.
Newest Articles: Balance
East and West Bush's
Tax Plan Just Doesn't Cut It
The
Firm, The Market and The Law by Ronald Coase
Check out the new additions to the book reviews section. **Thanks for everyone who has filled out a book review for theshortrun. Once things settle down a little here, I'll get to work posting some of these on the website. Again, I appreciate your support and effort** Interested in being a contributor to the short run? Show off your economic knowledge and breadth of learning by reviewing an economic text. Simply visit the short run's reviews section and submit your own review. If accepted, we will publish it on the website and post links to it both on the front page and in the newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. - DLH |
SCREEN SAVER
Issue #65 There are currently 450 subscribers to the short run weekly
|
theshortrun.com