Fellow
Shortrunners,
Making headline news this week, at least among economists, was a
meeting of the finance ministers of the G-7, the world's economic
powerhouse nations. Their conclusion was a no-brainer - that the
global economy is slowing, but they remained optimistic about future
prospects. Indeed, at least for the moment, it appears that there is
weakness in the great majority of the world's economies. I'm going
to quickly run through some of the world's major economies just to give a
quick briefing on the state of world growth to help put future
developments into perspective. Japan, which basically
stopped growing in 1990, has been grappling with severe economic
stagnation, deflation, and corruption. Europe's labor market
rigidities have helped to slow gains from cuts in interest rates by the
European Central Bank. East Asia, which is heavily reliant on
exports to the US and Japan (both ailing economies), is likely to suffer a
slowdown as well. Latin American nations, Argentina in particular,
appear to be postponing credit crunches and downturns through goodwill in
the financial markets, but their long-run debt burdens continue to grow.
The majority of nations in the continent of Africa, although not
necessarily economically powerful, but certainly very important, have
witnessed extreme economic contractions over the past decade, so much so
that living conditions have significantly deteriorated, erasing a great
deal of previous progress. Why? The simple answer is HIV and AIDS.
The disease has become rampant on the continent and remains a serious
threat to their well-being. Russia and its former satellite states
don't appear to be doing extremely well either. A recent study
showed that life expectancy, which has long been used as a proxy for
quality of life, has actually been declining there. The poor
economy, coupled with massive unemployment and corruption, has led to a
significant rise in alcohol consumption. Thus, one of the main
causes of death there has become alcoholism. Things certainly don't look
good in the short run, which is a drastic change from the prosperity that
the great majority of the industrialized world was feeling in the late
1990s. Improvement in the US economy, and in other major economies
such as Japan, is no longer merely a domestic interest. Increased
integration, supply chain dependencies, trade, technology flow, and a
range of other buzz words now suggest that for the world to remain
economically healthy and growing, it will take turnarounds in many of the
world's major economies. Even if the US manages to escape its
admittedly small slump in the short term, it will face other dangers if
economies abroad don't pick up, including the dollar overhang (an outflow
of US currency as the trade deficit increases) and falling exports. I've mentioned some pretty
hefty problems and talked about the future, but I really haven't offered
any solutions. That's not to say there aren't any; there are many
intriguing possibilities. For example, economic solutions abroad
probably require a great deal of structural reforms such as reforming the
marketplace and fighting corruption in both the economy and the political
system. In the United States, investment activity and manufacturing
growth would be significant signs of a rebound, but the only real thing
that can help is patience. If the markets can ride the storm of
falling asset prices and increasing joblessness without panics or
significant governmental intrusion, it's likely that the US can save
itself and possibly help the world economy at the same time. That said, the role of
steering the US economy falls upon the Federal Reserve and Alan Greenspan.
Despite recent criticism (and governmental involvement in the form of tax
cuts), he looks to play a key role in the near future. He's fared
through the Asian financial crisis in 1997-1998, several Latin American
debt crises, a brief recession at the turn of the 1990s, and several
significant stock market plummets, and has still gained a great deal of
respect. It's apparent that for some critics, this praise was
fleeting. All bets are off, but if they weren't, my money would
certainly still be on Greenspan.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks Economic Releases The data section provides charts and data for the most important economic indicators. Construction Spending: 0.3%
Check out the new classroom section and watch for it to grow and change in the coming weeks as we implement drastic reconstruction to the section. Comment and suggestions as to the best method for this kind of a section would be extremely helpful.
Newest Articles: Balance
East and West Bush's
Tax Plan Just Doesn't Cut It
Maestro:
Greenspan's Fed and the American Boom by Bob Woodward Murder
at the Margin by Marshall Jevons
Check out the new additions to the classroom and the studies sections. **Thanks for everyone who has filled out a book review for theshortrun. Once things settle down a little here, I'll get to work posting some of these on the website. Again, I appreciate your support and effort** Interested in being a contributor to the short run? Show off your economic knowledge and breadth of learning by reviewing an economic text. Simply visit the short run's reviews section and submit your own review. If accepted, we will publish it on the website and post links to it both on the front page and in the newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. - DLH |
SCREEN SAVER
Issue #58 There are currently 427 subscribers to the short run weekly
|
theshortrun.com