Fellow Shortrunners, For starters, some economists have noted that the NIPA understates the current level of US saving. The reason for this is that the NIPA doesn't take into account income in the form of capital gains. Realized capital gains can be thought of as income that someone gets from selling something for more than they bought it. This could be a stock or a piece of land or a house. What's more, the tax that is paid on these gains is counted as a subtraction from income. If we take this into account we see that the saving rate hasn't actually been declining over the past decade; it has remained pretty constant around 10%. In fact, this is a rather normal rate of saving. John Maynard Keynes, arguably the most famous economist of the 20th century, had realized the importance of an economy's savings rate in his 1936 work "The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money." Here, he noted that a normal rate of saving for an economy would be within the range of 8 to 13%. Using his definition, we can rest confidently. Or can we? Everyone who owns stock, and most people who don't, still know that recently the market hasn't been performing very well at all. In fact, it has done poorly enough that income growth isn't keeping up with consumption. With the Fed dropping interest rates, we can expect consumption in the short-term to pick up which should raise the disparity. Even more disturbing is that despite our new understanding of the saving rate, the level of consumer credit is still rising (people keep borrowing money). Can we explain this? I would argue that there are several reasons for this. A lot of people have become involved in the stock market. Fifty years ago, a very small percentage of the US population owned stock. Now, well more than half own stock. As the market ran up over the past decade, many people have been interested in getting a piece of the action, investing despite having other debts. Many people own stock and hold mortgages and credit card bills at the same time. Although they may not realize it, they are essentially assuming that they will make a better return in the market than they will be paying on their debt. This expectation of profit is sometimes known as speculation, and in high levels it can be dangerous. This may help to explain some run up in credit, but why could we expect to see increased spending? To understand this, we really need to look at what motivates people to spend their money. There are several different theories of this, but one of the most prominent today is attributed to two economists, Ando and Modigliani, who won a Nobel prize for their work on what is called the Consumption Function. Before they came onto the scene, most people argued that spending was based on your level of income, or on your desire to "keep up with the Joneses," or stay on the level of your neighbors. Ando and Modigliani argued that people save money most of their working life and spend out of savings in retirement, in what they called the life-cycle hypothesis. If we assume their theory is true, it would be especially evident now as the baby-boomer generation ages and begins to spend down a portion of their accumulated wealth. What's the
point of all this? Well, I really just wanted to show that the
economy hasn't undergone some fundamental change to one in which people
don't save money any more. The look at the rising credit and the
life-cycle hypothesis give the other side of the story. Perhaps
spending and saving patterns haven't changed much in the past decade, but
that doesn't mean they won't change. This can have important
implications for the economy and certainly will influence the financial
markets. Sincerely,
The data section provides charts and data for the most important economic indicators. Retail Sales: 0.7%
Business Inventories: 0.1%
Jobless claims: 352,000
Import and Export Prices: -0.4% and 0.2% respectively
NAHB Housing Market Index: 58
Housing Starts: 5.3%
Industrial Production: -0.3%
Producer Price Index: 1.1% (Core: 0.7%)
Know of an indicator I don't cover but
you think I should? Have suggestions as to how I cover the
indicators or to how the newsletter is constructed? Please let
me know; I really want to make this a useful tool to all of my
subscribers. The Shortrun Fed Watch section contains the most recent beige books as well as speeches by Fed Governors with a brief description of each speech and in some cases a Shortrunner's opinion on its significance. Curious as to the records of our Fed watchers? Visit the Fed Watch opinions on monetary policy section to see whose predictions have been on target.
Newest Articles: Looming
Stagflation 2001:
A Monetary Odyssey
Murder
at the Margin by Marshall Jevons The
End of Work by Jeremy Rifkin
Interested in being a contributor to the short run? Show off your economic knowledge and breadth of learning by reviewing an economic text. Simply visit the short run's reviews section and submit your own review. If accepted, we will publish it on the website and post links to it both on the front page and in the newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. - DLH |
SCREEN SAVER
Issue #38 There are currently 166 subscribers to the short run weekly
|
theshortrun.com