Fellow Shortrunners,
One of the major indicators of the success of a country's economy and usually of the incumbent political party is a measure of the unemployment rate. There are two sides to the coin, which the Federal Reserve does its best to balance. Employing as many people as possible is a good social goal to have. On the other hand, when too many people are employed, it becomes difficult for companies to find new workers. Not only that, but workers begin to demand higher wages, and this can result in inflation. The question then becomes what level of employment should a country aim to achieve. The concept of a natural rate of unemployment (the level just before it becomes inflationary) is often called the NAIRU. The NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment) is an abstraction that is useful to both central bankers and politicians. The problem that is often misunderstood is that it changes over time. Estimates of the NAIRU at the start of the 1990's were around 6%. Today they range from 3.5 to 4.5%.1 The NAIRU in fact is dependent upon several different factors which I will discuss here. There is no doubt that increases in the minimum wage increases unemployment. In fact, they increase the natural level of unemployment by making labor more expensive to hire. Unions have the same effect. While workers can unionize to try to get better working conditions and benefits, these unions have the effect of costing the workers more jobs. In Europe, where social benefits are extreme compared to the US, the level of unemployment for countries like France, Germany, and Italy is about twice what it is in the US. These differences are the result of things like unions and wage laws, which economists call structural differences. These structural differences change the amount of people that can work in the economy without the price level becoming affected. There are plenty of outside factors that affect the NAIRU. For instance, things like supply shocks can cause short run changes to the level. For those with a little more economic background, some estimates of the NAIRU are derived from the Phillips Curve (a graph of inflation and unemployment). Unfortunately, the Phillips Curve has been relatively unsuccessful in recent years at predicting a tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. This is really what has sparked the interest at understanding what the NAIRU really should be. Those who have taken an introductory economics course have learned that there are different types of unemployment: structural, cyclical, and frictional unemployment (if you are confused by this, further reading on these types of unemployment can be found in the classroom section of theshortrun.com). What many people don't know is that one of the components of frictional unemployment is something called search unemployment. This search unemployment is really a measure of those people without jobs, with their reason for not having a job being that they have not yet found a job that matches their skills with an employers needs. In other words, the longer it takes for a financial analysis to find a financial firm needing his or her services, the larger the level of search unemployment. In my mind, with the advent of services like monster.com and hotjobs.com, the amount of time it takes to match skills with jobs has decreased. This could be one possible explanation for at least a portion of the decrease in the US NAIRU over the past few years. I hope everyone had a great break, and I am sorry about running a little long on my newsletter, but there really wasn't a great deal of new data released due to the holiday and I felt a need to compensate. Sincerely,
The data section provides charts and data for the most important economic indicators. This week is a little light on the releases because of the Thanksgiving holiday. Trade Balance: $ -34.26 billion
Budget: $ -11.3 billion
Jobless Claims: 336,000
Know of an indicator I don't cover but you
think I should? Have suggestions as to how I cover the indicators or
to how the newsletter is constructed? Please let
me know; I really want to make this a useful tool to all of my
subscribers. The Shortrun Fed Watch section contains the most recent beige books as well as speeches by Fed Governors with a brief description of each speech and in some cases a Shortrunner's opinion on its significance. Curious as to the records of our Fed watchers? Visit the Fed Watch opinions on monetary policy section to see whose predictions have been on target.
Newest Articles: Has
the information age really improved living standards? Fledgling
Euro Wrestles to Consolidate the Different Labor and Political
Environments Across Nations Newest Book Reviews: The
Great Crash 1929 The
Good Society
Interested in being a contributor to the short run? Show off your economic knowledge and breadth of learning by reviewing an economic text. Simply visit the short run's reviews section and submit your own review. If accepted, we will publish it on the website and post links to it both on the front page and in the newsletter.
Source: If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. - DLH |
SCREEN SAVER
Issue #27 There are currently 122 subscribers to the short run weekly |
theshortrun.com