Fellow Shortrunners,
Economists and philosophers of science have long debated the correct method for creating economic theories and models. One person to chime in on the subject was Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman, who wrote what is likely the most influential piece on the methodology of economics in the late 1950s. Friedman espoused the view that what mattered when creating models was to strive for predictive power. That is, models should aim to be accurate and to make a large number of predictions. This fit well with the intellectual climate in which Friedman was immersed. Along with fellow economists such as Frank Knight who pioneered what has come to be called neoclassical economics and the Chicago school, these economists made advances in modeling using a large range of simplifying and nullifying assumptions such as perfect competition and perfect rationality. Along these lines, economists such as Schelling and Akerlof have devised models which can tell us about the real world. Schelling's checkerboard model describes how even slight preference differences can drive an entire community to become segregated. Akerlof's famous lemons problem describes how the market for used car dealers has developed. More importantly however, they tell us things about how individuals make choices, how they deal with uncertainty, and how specific institutions such as used car trading posts come about. These models have sometimes been referred to as counterfactual worlds. They are abstractions from reality, but at the same time they are used to gain insights about the world we live in. The main criticism of Friedman and other instrumentalist economists is that the assumptions used in their modeling are abstractions. They are divorced from reality. As a result, it is possible that their model could lead to inaccurate predictions. Those who look for realism in their assumptions have come to be called Causalists. The Causalists would find fault in Schelling and Akerlof's work. The most common example cited is the Black-Schoales pricing model. This model can value certain financial instruments. Most people who use the model in the quotidian financial world don't know that there are certain situations in which it will not accurately value the instrument. What can be taken away from such economics debates? It is clear that the Causalist's claim is far from the mark. If the charge is that divorcing models from reality can lead to models that give false predictions, then Friedman's instrumentalist result would lead to models with perfectly realistic models. Furthermore, examples such as the Black-Schoales model are failures not of models and theory but of application. Economists must be careful to explain the effects of simplifying assumptions. Those who take theory and apply it to the real world must be careful not to extend results to situations in which we know they don't hold.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
ISM Manufacturing Index:
49.4%
ISM Non-Manufacturing Index:
54.5%
1st Quarter Productivity
Revision: 1.9%
Jobless Claims: 442,000
Consumer Credit: 7.25%
Unemployment:
6.1%
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 123
As usual, I welcome comments or feedback; simply reply to this newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com