Fellow
Shortrunners,
As oil prices continue to escalate amongst fears of conflict in the Middle East, the international value of the dollar continues to decline. Against the Euro, the dollar has hit its lowest point since 1999, and speculation may take it further. Given the economy's weak labor market and lackluster recovery, interest rates are likely to remain low. All of these trends are likely to spark inflation, but have yet to do so because firms are still plagued by excess capacity and an inability to raise prices. As long as excess capacity remains rampant, firms are likely to stay away from hiring. This week's unemployment release, which showed firms scaling back current payrolls by some 100,000 in December, fueled fears of and comments on another "jobless recovery." The last "jobless recovery" was presided over during Bush senior's presidency. Bush was heavily criticized for his failure to focus on the domestic economy at a time of weak employment figures, and it looks like our current president is attempting not to make the same mistake. This week the president unveiled a larger than expected stimulus plan with a price tag approaching $670 billion. Aimed at "jobs and growth," the stimulus plan is largely based around tax breaks. As some predicted, the President's stimulus plan includes the elimination of the dividends tax. This is an effort to stimulate the economy, though whether it will stimulate the economy in any "urgent" manner is questionable. It will if it lifts the stock market. Such a move might stimulate consumer confidence and thus overall spending and economic growth. Most economists don't see this as a possibility and argue that any benefit from reducing the dividend tax will likely show up in the long-run, especially since today dividends comprise a small part of most individuals' budgets. Even more, many dividend payments go straight to retirement plans and would thus have a more marginal impact on individuals' disposable income. Additionally, the Bush stimulus plan would accelerate some already planned tax cuts. The plan was immediately criticized for both its girth and the lack of immediate stimuli. It has rightfully been called a heavily partisan plan. The democrats, suggest that for any plan to be a stimulus to the current economy suggest, it should be frontloaded. They proposed an alternate plan, costing around $136 billion and completely taking place over the course of the next year. Both plans have their positives, though for different reasons. One thing among the plans was similar however. Both recognized a need to send more money to the states. Of all the two parties' proposals, this appears to be one of the most clear cut. With states facing budget shortfalls and the constraint of balanced budget amendments, extra funding will help prevent further cutbacks.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
ISM Non-Manufacturing Index:
54.7%
Consumer Credit: -$2.2 Billion
Wholesale Trade: 0.2%
Jobless Claims:
392,000
Unemployment: 6.0%
ECRI
Future Inflation Gauge: 116.6
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 119.1
As usual, I welcome comment or feedback; simply reply to this newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com