Fellow
Shortrunners,
This Tuesday, the President is set to unveil a stimulus package to the tune of $600 billion, a figure amounting to nearly 6% the annual income of the entire United States. Speculation suggests that proposals will include an acceleration of the enormous tax cut passed in 2001 and an elimination of the dividends tax. Though it's too early to speculate, a large number of the proposals on the table seem to suggest that the stimulus package will likely come in the form of a tax cut rather than in increased government spending. But what exactly should the government do, given the weak recovery of the US economy and ailing financial markets? If the package is aimed at stimulating economic growth, then a cut or abolition of the dividends tax is not likely to do very much good. Dividend income makes up only a smidgen of total GDP, and a large portion of dividends go into retirement accounts or other funds where they may not encourage economic growth. I have previously argued that taxing dividends is a bad thing, but for an entirely different reason. If firms have a greater incentive to pay dividends (which some argue are now taxed 2x), then the stock market could once again use dividend payments as a measure of a firm's well-being. Whether this would happen remains to be seen. It is unlikely, as some hope, that reducing dividend taxes would encourage firms to do more equity financing through stock as opposed to debt because tax breaks still exist for firms to hold debt. If the stimulus package is aimed at helping the stock market, a dividend tax cut might help but probably not to that large of an extent. Part of the justification behind further tax cuts has been that states are likely to have to raise taxes. Balanced budget amendments have been plaguing state governments as revenue growth has slowed. One way in which a stimulus package could be used would be to funnel funds directly to the states. Provided that this money was not earmarked for new programs and initiatives, it could help states balance their budgets, preventing cutbacks in expenditure and in employment. This would have a direct impact on economic growth. It will be interesting to see to what extent state governments, almost all of which are facing budget shortfalls, will be beneficiaries of the stimulus package. Finally, one question will loom over any proposal. Simply, is the stimulus really needed? A number of recent economic figures have been weak. Consumer confidence is plummeting and the labor market stubbornly refuses to improve. But at the same time, interest rates are low, the federal government is already back in the red, and further spending could spark inflation. Other figures are even suggesting that the economy's fundamentals are still running on all cylinders. Specifically, the past two productivity and output figures have been stronger than expected. Inflation seems tame for the moment and this week's ISM manufacturing report showed a healthy rebound. All these suggest that the US economy may be on its way to recovery on its own. Only time will tell if the government feels the same way.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
Existing Home Sales: -3.5%
Consumer Confidence: 80.3
ISM Manufacturing: 54.7%
Jobless Claims:
403,000
Construction Spending:
0.3%
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 117.6
As usual, I welcome comment or feedback; simply reply to this newsletter. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com