Fellow
Shortrunners,
On Tuesday, the FOMC will meet for the 8th time this year to set the course for US interest rates. In debating how to change the Fed Funds Rate, which stands at a historically low 1.25%, Greenspan & Co. will have much on their minds. This is a particularly difficult task because the economy is currently sending mixed signals. Among the quandaries facing today's economists is why jobless claims data is suggesting that the labor market is improving but November's unemployment report, which put headline unemployment at a lofty 6%, are conflicting. Reports from the Institute for Supply Management are suggesting that employment in the manufacturing sector is deteriorating as well. At the same time that employment is falling, output in the US continues to rise, which is resulting in some strong productivity figures. As long as productivity continues to expand, the US should be relatively isolated from any long-term inflationary pressure. This at least should give the FOMC some leeway in trying to figure the economy's situation out. In addition to analyzing data, policy makers will have to try to asses the impact of several significant developments on the future course of the US economy. Among the most important developments this week was the sacking of two of President Bush's key economists. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and chairman of the National Economic Council Larry Lindsey both resigned this week after having been asked to resign by the White House. Lindsey, during his tenure, had been instrumental in the architecture of Bush's mammoth tax cut. News that originally warmed the economy because many saw it as a sign that Bush was willing to shake things up to protect economic growth is now even more uncertain. It appears that John Snow, chairman of railway company CSX, has been nominated by the President to replace O'Neill. The move blindsided most economists who had expected a more prominent figure, not to mention one projecting an image somewhat different than that of former secretary O'Neill. Not only will uncertainty surrounding these appointments plague the market, continued potential conflict with Iraq will weigh heavily upon the FOMC as well. They must realize that some price pressure is starting to show in the economy and that the artificially inflated oil prices are one of many culprits. At the same time however, there is speculation that should the situation with Iraq be resolved without serious conflict that oil prices will drop dramatically (when the "war" premium dissolves). Perhaps OPEC fears this as well. They moved this week to curtail cheating (that is, the seeing of more oil by member nations than the cartel allows) by simply expanding production quotas closer to many countries' actual production limits. I'm not sure that many economists would suggest that such a move would halt cheating. In fact, it seems that they may even be shooting themselves in the foot, since by providing a course of action that is actually rewarding member countries that are violating the agreement, they may send the message that cheating is ok. But then again, OPEC is rarely the target of praise, nor should it be.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
ISM Manufacturing Index: 49.2
Construction Spending:
0.2%
Productivity: 5.1%
ISM Non-Manufacturing:
57.4
Jobless Claims:
355,000
Unemployment: 6.0%
Consumer Credit:
$8.5 Billion
ECRI
Future Inflation Gauge: 114.5
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 120.8
As always, I welcome your suggestions on this newsletter and on the site as a whole. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com