Fellow
Shortrunners,
The abbreviated business week carried with it a string of positive economic news. It also saw Black Friday (as firms move from losses or red for the year to profitability or black), the Friday after Thanksgiving which is traditionally one of the heaviest shopping days of the year. Preliminary estimates suggest that last Friday was indeed a good time for retailers. Black Friday also marks the beginning of the Christmas shopping season, a crucial time for retailers which will likely determine whether a number of US firms can stay out of the red and in the black. Just as America's economy finally appears to be recovering, it has launched what appears to be a relatively ambitious plan at liberalizing international trade. Elucidated by US trade representative Robert Zoellick, the plan calls for the elimination of all tariffs on trade in manufactured goods between WTO nations by the year 2015. While the plan might hold water with the world's richest nations, whose trade flows are dominated by manufacturing goods, it will certainly be opposed by the world's developing nations. And for good reason. They have much to lose from such a plan. Choosing to single out manufacturing goods (which already have lower tariffs than agricultural goods) is unfair to the developing world in several ways. Most importantly, it neglects devoting attention to reducing tariffs on agricultural goods and commodities, the primary exports of the developing world. While they face resistance to exports, the developed world's manufactures would then have freer access to the developing world's markets. For the developing world, which already struggles to compete in agricultural production with the developed world because of its strong agricultural subsidies, could experience further damage to what little domestic manufacturing their economy now supports by the freer imports. In a sense, reducing manufacturing barriers for these countries can be seen as their dropping of protectionist tariffs while their already richer trading partners fail to drop theirs. Not only are the tariffs higher on agricultural goods, but subsidies to farmers in the US and to an even greater extent to farmers in Europe and Japan are higher than developing countries could ever hope to offer. Just as the EU is struggling to reform its Common Agricultural Policy, the US and its pacific neighbor should face up to their farmers and decide on a plan for reducing subsidies which have a direct cost on consumers around the world and as well as on producers in developing countries.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
Existing Home Sales: 5.77
Million Units
New Home Sales: 1.007 Million Units
3rd Quarter GDP: 4.0%
Consumer Confidence:
84.1
Advance Durable Goods:
2.8%
Personal Income:
0.1%
Jobless Claims:
364,000
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 119.3
As always, I welcome your suggestions on this newsletter and on the site as a whole. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com