Fellow
Shortrunners,
One thing that economists like to do is to construct models. Econometricians have been analyzing data to come up with equations that purport to predict the future course of the economy for almost a century now. A significant portion of intellectual debate has centered on the pragmatism of such work. Philosophers have questioned whether economics can ever find true relations or even probabilistic ones. Economists such as Robert Lucas have attacked econometrics as a policy tool on the grounds that it cannot take into account expectations. Rational individuals behavior will be influenced by policy. Because of this, any policy based on econometric models would change what the policy was predicting in the first place and thus be subject to error. Sure, consumers, producers, the market as a whole is clever, maybe even rational. So are policy makers though. The Federal Reserve is charged with maintaining price stability in the United States. Its officials know that the policy it chooses will affect the economy by impacting both the real economy and expectations. For example, most conventional economists would agree that when people are confident that prices will rise, they will tend to act in a way that bids up prices. One of the big worries of late has been over possible deflation, that is, falling prices. So what better way to ensure price stability than to talk about the Fed's ability to maintain it? In fact, this is just what happened this week. Twice. First, new Fed Governor Ben Bernanke gave a speech outlining the likelihood of deflation and the measures that the Fed could take to stave it off. In short, he suggested that deflation was unlikely to occur in the US with its strong financial sector, resilient and flexible markets, and the recent stability in prices. Finally, he suggested that Federal Reserve would stand as a "bulwark" against deflation. It could add money to the economy even if interest rates were taken down to zero. To do so, "the Fed must expand the scale of its asset purchases or, possibly, expand the menu of assets that it buys." Here, Bernanke is suggesting that the Fed could even become involved in other sectors of the US economy. It could for instance buy corporate shares, foreign government debt, or even make low-interest-rate loans. Stressing that prevention was preferable to curing deflation, he notes that fiscal policy can always be used as an economic stimulus. Second, Dallas Fed President Robert McTeer, a noted dove, suggested that interest rates, at their current level, were just right. While suggesting that he did not fear deflation for the US economy, low interest rates would still allow the Fed could kill 2 birds with one stone. That is, they will tackle the very real problem of stimulating faster economic growth as well as help to combat potential deflation. Both Fed economists make valid points. In reality, we just haven't seen enough hard economic data to make a valid case for deflation in the near future. It seems most of the talk of deflation in the US so far has been mere speculation.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
International Trade: -$38 Billion
NAHB Housing Index: 65
Consumer Price Index:
0.3%
Housing Starts: 1.6 Million
Index of Leading Indicators:
0.0%
Treasury Budget:
-$54 Billion
Jobless Claims:
376,000
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 118.2
As always, I welcome your suggestions on this newsletter and on the site as a whole. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com