Fellow
Shortrunners,
British roads are suffering from dramatic congestion. The rise in traffic has prompted politicians to pursue plans to reduce the burden on many of the country's roadways. The government has set a tentative goal of reducing overall crowding on Britain's roads by some 6% over the next 10 years. The first major plan, a proposal by London's mayor Ken Livingston, will come into force this February and aims at tackling the near standstill traffic jams that grip inner London nearly every day. Indeed the most common joke running around is that traffic in the city is slower today than it was during the days of horse drawn carriages. The sad part is, it's true. Average speed in the city runs at about 9 mph. Aptly termed congestion charging, the program would introduce a £5 ($8) fee daily to travel into the central portion of the city. Those traveling frequently into the city and those living in the designated area will be required to pay the relatively hefty fee every day. Only delivery trucks, motorcycles, taxis, and buses will be exempt from the charges. Drivers are expected to purchase permits to pay the daily charge. To enforce compliance, a complicated computer video monitoring system is being installed that will take pictures of the license plates of vehicles driving through central London, check them in a database of plates of paying drivers, and bill those without permits. Being caught will mean a hefty fee approaching £80 ($128). To accommodate more people on public transport, an additional 200 buses will be added to London's already sizable fleet. Congestion charging should, in theory, reduce traffic problems in central London in two ways. A greater disincentive to drive into or through central London should reduce traffic, pushing more people towards public transport. Secondly, if the system is able to pay off its relatively hefty setup costs, revenue from congestion charging could be used to finance further public transportation improvements. What remains to be seen however is the efficacy and popularity of such a system. Initial tests suggest that the computer systems can catch over 70% of violators, which is a promising sign. The program is rooted in firm economic principles, but this doesn't guarantee success. There are also secondary factors slowing traffic through the city which won't be addressed by the plan, such as new construction. Others cite the introduction of more pedestrian crossings over the past few years, some with more time devoted to walkers, as a reason for the slower traffic. If anything, the mayor's plan is a risky one. The question seems not to be whether the system can work, but rather whether the drivers of London will abide it.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
Business Inventories:
-0.1%
NAHB Index:
62%
Industrial Production:
-0.1%
Housing Starts:1.84 Million
Jobless Claims:
411,000
Consumer Price Index: 0.2%
Trade Balance:
-$38.5 Billion
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 116.5
As always, I welcome your suggestions on this newsletter and on the site as a whole. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com