Fellow
Shortrunners,
Sometimes even I fail to appreciate the importance of modern economic reforms. Moving to London has, over the course of the past few weeks, reminded me of exactly how crucial many modern economic developments are for quotidian life. The first has been my experience with British Telecom. Anti-trust action broke new ground in the United States when it separated Standard Oil. That progressive step continued and the US has recently encouraged competition in the utilities. Competition among telecommunications corporations led to rapid acceptance of new information technologies. It also became so fierce as to drive down prices (bad news for technology firms but good news for customers). A lack of competition stifles innovation and technological progress. More noticeably, it also stifles customer service. High speed internet access is one such case. Despite deregulation and a number of new competitors, provision in many parts of London still relies upon Britain's telecom mammoth BT. As such, obtaining an internet connection capable of sending this newsletter through BT has been a difficult process claiming over 2 weeks of effort. I mention this both to illustrate the importance of competition and to provide an excuse for my sporadic newsletters over the past few weeks. I am truly sorry for any inconvenience and for those interested, Weekly Newsletters for the past few weeks are available in the newsletter archive on the website. The second major observation is just how easy one of the world's largest cities can find itself brought to a standstill. In the course of a month, access to the inner city has been seriously impeded 3 times. The first time came when some 400,000 British came into the city of London to show their support for the "Liberty and Livelihood" of the countryside. The march was sparked by efforts in Parliament to outlaw foxhunting, but grew in size when the entire countryside decided to amend a slew of new reasons for marching. The second two days in which London ground to a halt, the London Underground workers went on strike. The absence of the tube as a means of transportation made travel in the city nearly impossible even with many not even venturing out for the day. In both instances, the protestors are certainly making a point and gaining attention, but at what cost? Strikes and protests can seriously damage the economy. A recent poll showed that Americans are, on average, more concerned about the economy than about the prospect of war in Iraq. This is not surprising This view, which reflects a change in popular opinion over the past month portends a dramatic decline in consumer confidence. This is why, when California dock workers went on strike, the President was correct in moving to send the strikers back to work. Bush's motion to end the strike motivated both sides to sign an 80 day suspension agreement. This is important for a number of reasons. On the international side, resolving the strike is crucial for a number of other countries in Asia which are heavily reliant upon US trade. It should also help the faltering US economy as economists had estimated costs of the strike to run at $2 billion a day.
Sincerely,
Daniel Hicks
Consumer Credit:
2.9%
Import / Export Prices:
0.7% / 0.2%
Wholesale Inventories:
0.2%
Jobless Claims: 384,000
Retail Sales:
-1.2%
Producer Price Index:
0.1%
ECRI Weekly Leading Index: 118.2
There is a new finance study on the main page. Last weeks newsletter is available in the newsletter archive. If you would like to unsubscribe, simply reply with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. |
the short run weekly is a free
service. please help support its development.
SCREEN SAVER
|
theshortrun.com